Skip to content
UncategorizedReporting

Which Country Receives the Most Money from the American People?

Ukraine led FY2025 U.S. foreign-aid disbursements; Israel leads since WWII and Afghanistan leads the FY2001–2025 series. Apep Bar traces money through the World Bank, Pentagon, contractors, banks and governments.

By SaKmNov 1, 20268 min read
▣ Source: Apep Bar Staff
United States Capitol building in Washington DC, illustrating congressional appropriations and federal foreign assistance

APEP BAR INVESTIGATION | November 1, 2026

By the Apep Bar Research Desk. Data checked against ForeignAssistance.gov’s October 30, 2026 update, the Congressional Research Service, Government Accountability Office, USAFacts and Pew Research Center.

The short answer: Ukraine received the most reported U.S. foreign-aid disbursements in fiscal 2025—approximately $6.75 billion. But Israel is the largest cumulative recipient since World War II, while Afghanistan leads a different, shorter historical series covering 2001–2025. These are three distinct measurements, not competing answers. The harder question is where the money actually goes: foreign treasuries, multilateral institutions, U.S. defense manufacturers, humanitarian organizations, contractors, or domestic military stockpile replenishment.

1. The most recent fully reported year: who received the most?

According to USAFacts’ September 28, 2026 analysis of U.S. foreign-assistance data, the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025 ranked countries as follows. Figures are rounded and reflect reported disbursements, not congressional authorizations or arms-sale announcements.

Rank Country FY2025 disbursements
1 Ukraine $6.75 billion
2 Israel $3.31 billion
3 Jordan $1.65 billion
4 Ethiopia $919.8 million
5 Democratic Republic of the Congo $749.8 million
6 Nigeria $730.5 million
7 Sudan $709.1 million
8 Kenya $654.5 million
9 Mozambique $583.9 million
10 Uganda $512.7 million

Afghanistan received approximately $431.4 million in FY2025 disbursements and did not rank among the top ten. Pew Research Center’s July 21, 2026 analysis recorded Ukraine at $6.697 billion using an earlier July 1 data snapshot. USAFacts’ later figure is about $55.5 million higher; the rankings agree. Foreign-assistance figures can be revised as agencies update reporting.

2. Appropriated, obligated, disbursed: three different stages

Appropriation is Congress providing legal budget authority. Obligation is a binding federal commitment—such as a grant agreement or contract. Disbursement is a recorded payment from a U.S. government account. An obligation made in one fiscal year may produce disbursements in later years; cancellations can also create negative net obligations. Therefore, adding these three figures together would count the same financing multiple times.

The primary ForeignAssistance.gov Ukraine country record shows about $18.007 billion in FY2025 obligations, with its recorded obligation categories approximately 71% military and 29% economic. That is not $18 billion paid into Ukraine’s treasury during FY2025. The separately reported $6.75 billion in disbursements measures a different stage of funding. The official Israel record reports about $3.305 billion obligated, while Jordan’s record reports about $1.619 billion obligated. These are current-dollar country activity figures from the official database; USAFacts’ ranking uses inflation-adjusted disbursement figures. The ForeignAssistance.gov data portal provides country summaries and activity files for independent examination.

One striking example: the Afghanistan country page currently reports approximately negative $9.7 million in net FY2025 obligations, even though disbursements attributed to Afghanistan were approximately $431 million. Negative obligations can reflect deobligations of previous commitments. They do not mean Afghanistan sent the U.S. government $9.7 million.

3. Who leads over decades? It depends on the clock

USAFacts’ FY2001–FY2025 inflation-adjusted disbursement series ranks Afghanistan first, at approximately $154.8 billion, followed by Israel ($106.6 billion), Iraq ($94.8 billion), Ukraine ($69.5 billion), Egypt ($52.3 billion) and Jordan ($35.5 billion). These totals are cumulative for that specific 25-year period and adjusted for inflation; they are not equivalent to a single year’s cash transfers or to the lifetime value of arms deals. Source: USAFacts

For the longer period since World War II, the Congressional Research Service report updated May 28, 2025 calls Israel the largest cumulative recipient. CRS reported approximately $174 billion in bilateral aid and missile-defense funding in non-inflation-adjusted dollars through that report’s cutoff. Comparing $174 billion in historical nominal dollars to the $154.8 billion inflation-adjusted Afghanistan figure is mathematically inappropriate; the time periods, accounting scope and dollar basis differ.

4. Follow the money: Ukraine’s multiple pipelines

Ukraine-related spending is not one giant bank transfer. Some appropriations fund weapons delivered from existing U.S. inventories, some replace those inventories through U.S. procurement, some finance newly manufactured defense articles, and other streams pay for economic support or humanitarian work. The GAO’s Ukraine funding review explicitly warns, through its accounting, that the more than $174 billion appropriated across five supplemental acts supported the U.S. response to the Ukraine crisis, including activities in the United States and some outside Ukraine. It is misleading to describe that entire amount as cash handed to Kyiv.

Pipeline A: U.S. government → World Bank → eligible Ukrainian government expenses. The official FY2025 Ukraine activity list identifies a $3.415 billion ‘Macroeconomic Support’ obligation with the World Bank Group as partner. The GAO’s September 24, 2025 audit describes a much larger, multi-year direct-budget-support mechanism: approximately $45 billion in U.S. funding had been provided through World Bank channels by August 2025, comprising about $30.2 billion in congressionally appropriated support and $15 billion from a loan mechanism intended to be serviced with revenue from immobilized Russian sovereign assets. This $45 billion is a cumulative program total across years, not an additional FY2025 payment to add to the country ranking. World Bank reimbursements support eligible Ukrainian salaries and social benefits; the World Bank and U.S. agencies are intermediaries and overseers, not the final household beneficiaries.

Oversight finding: GAO identified unusual changes in some Ukrainian expenditure data and weaknesses in monitoring and internal controls. It recommended stronger State Department oversight after USAID responsibilities shifted in July 2025. Such findings warrant scrutiny, but they do not by themselves establish that the entire assistance program was stolen or diverted.

Pipeline B: U.S. defense budget → U.S. manufacturers → replenishment of American stocks. The GAO’s May 2024 defense review found that Congress had provided $25.9 billion by March 2024 for the Defense Department to replace weapons transferred to Ukraine; more than $18 billion had been obligated by December 2023, with over $16 billion for weapons procurement and industrial-base expansion. Those are earlier-period, U.S.-side expenditures, not an extra $25.9 billion of cash delivered to the Ukrainian government. To identify particular contractors and payments, award numbers and subawards must be traced through USAspending.gov.

5. Follow the money: Israel’s military financing and the contractors

The official FY2025 Israel activity record identifies a $3.3 billion Foreign Military Financing (FMF) program obligation, with the U.S. Department of Defense listed as the implementing government partner. Israel’s FY2025 aid was overwhelmingly military: Pew’s July 2026 breakdown placed approximately 99.8% of its FY2025 disbursements in the military category.

FMF often finances procurement of defense articles and services rather than a general-purpose transfer to a foreign treasury. CRS describes U.S. firms including Lockheed Martin and Boeing in Israeli procurement and RTX/Raytheon in missile-defense co-production. Its report also describes a specific F-35 deferred-payment arrangement: a private banking consortium led by Citibank pays Lockheed Martin under the described financing structure, and later FMF allocations are used to repay the bank, while Israel pays interest from its own funds. That is a documented example of how foreign assistance can pass through a U.S. bank and U.S. defense contractor. It is not proof that every FY2025 FMF dollar followed that particular path.

CRS also reports that Israel’s authority to spend some FMF on Israeli-manufactured equipment—’off-shore procurement’—was being phased out by FY2028. FY2025 legislation specified $450.3 million for this exception. Therefore, the simple claim that ‘all Israel aid is spent in America’ would also be wrong. Source: CRS RL33222, pages on FMF and off-shore procurement

Important accounting warning: A notified $18.82 billion potential F-15 sale or another arms-sale announcement is not the same thing as $18.82 billion in taxpayer aid disbursed that year. Arms sales may involve the buyer’s own money, U.S. financing, multi-year contracts, or combinations of those. They must be tracked separately.

6. Follow the money: Jordan and Afghanistan

Jordan is a clearer example of direct government budget support. The FY2025 Jordan activity register lists a $706.35 million ‘Cash Transfer to the Government of Jordan’ obligation under USAID’s Economic Support Fund, with the Government of Jordan as partner. Other Jordan assistance is military or project-based. The $706.35 million is a recorded obligation and should not be represented as a verified same-day bank transfer without matching disbursement evidence.

Afghanistan demonstrates the opposite problem: aid attributed to a country does not necessarily go to its ruling authorities. The FY2025 Afghanistan activity register identifies implementing partners such as United Nations organizations, U.S.-based NGOs, enterprises and government agencies, with some recipient names redacted. A geographic aid total is therefore not evidence that the Taliban directly received the whole amount. The ultimate recipients and controls must be investigated project by project.

7. The records taxpayers should demand

For each major aid stream, a genuine money trail requires the authorizing law; appropriations account; funding and managing agency; activity or award ID; obligation date and amount; disbursement date and amount; prime recipient; subrecipients; location of performance; and evidence of final delivery or benefit. The USAspending federal spending guide explains recipient and award records, while its advanced search permits filtering by fiscal year, agency, recipient, award type and subawards. ForeignAssistance.gov supplies country, program, partner and activity data. These databases overlap but do not capture every overseas transaction or classified activity in the same way; numbers should be reconciled, not blindly summed.

The political debate is legitimate: supporters argue assistance serves national security, alliance commitments, humanitarian needs and stability; critics question opportunity costs, oversight, civilian harms, procurement incentives and whether funds achieve their stated purposes. Both sides deserve accurate numbers. Neither a foreign-aid ranking nor a corporate contract proves wrongdoing by itself.

The verdict

Largest FY2025 disbursement recipient: Ukraine ($6.75 billion). Largest FY2001–FY2025 inflation-adjusted cumulative recipient: Afghanistan ($154.8 billion). Largest cumulative recipient since World War II, according to CRS: Israel ($174 billion in historical nominal bilateral aid and missile-defense funding as reported in May 2025).

The next layer of accountability is not another headline ranking. It is the individual payment trail: which U.S. agency authorized each dollar, which intermediary handled it, which contractor or government received it, and what taxpayers can independently verify was delivered.

Primary records and methodology

Editor’s note: Figures are drawn from differing reporting cutoffs and definitions; numbers may change as federal agencies revise data. Where an amount is an obligation, a notified sale or a cumulative appropriation, this report labels it as such. Featured image: U.S. Capitol photograph by Caleb Perez via Unsplash; illustrative, not evidence of any particular transaction.

Related Stories